Table 2. Cases of producing plant-based meat analogues using advanced processing technologies

Technology Pros and cons of technology Plant protein Title References
High-moisture extrusion processing (HMEP) Pros: Dense fibrous structureCons: Short shelf life due to high moisture content(Choi and Ryu, 2022) Pea protein, Amylose, Amylopectin Protein-amylose/amylopectin molecular interactions during high-moisture extruded texturization toward plant-based meat substitutes applications Chen et al. (2022b)
Soy protein Morphology development and flow characteristics during high moisture extrusion of a plant-based meat analogue Wittek et al. (2021)
Pea protein, Peanut protein, Soy protein, Wheat gluten, Rice protein Water binding ability changes of different proteins during high-moisture extrusion Hu et al. (2024)
Pea protein isolate (PPI), Pea protein concentrate (PPC) Structure, texture, and sensory properties of plant-meat hybrids produced by high-moisture extrusion Pöri et al. (2023)
Soy protein, Pea protein, Wheat gluten Understanding protein functionality and its impact on quality of plant-based meat analogues Flory et al. (2023)
Low-moisture extrusion processing (LMEP), HMEP [LMEP]Pros: Easy handling, long shelf lifeCons: Expanded structure with porous layers Soy protein, Wheat gluten Comparison of the physicochemical properties of low and high-moisture extruded meat analog with varying moisture content Choi and Ryu (2022)
Shear cell Pros: Formation of fibrous structureCons: Testing is limited to laboratory scale(Krintiras et al., 2015) Soy protein, Pea Protein, Wheat Gluten Effect of mixing and hydrating time on the structural properties of high-temperature shear cell products from multiple plant-based ingredients Köllmann et al. (2024)
Soy protein, Pea protein, Wheat gluten Effect of fiber properties and orientation on the shear rheology and Poynting effect in meat and meat analogues Giménez-Ribes et al. (2024)
Soy protein Enhancing textural properties in plant-based meat alternatives: The impact of hydrocolloids and salts on soy protein-based products Dinani et al. (2023)
Ohmic heating Pros: High efficiency in converting electrical energy into heatCons: Insufficient research on producing meat analogues(Jung et al., 2022) Soy protein, Wheat gluten Application of ohmic cooking to produce a soy protein-based meat analogue Jung et al. (2022)
Peanut protein Influence of ohmic heating on structure, texture and flavor of peanut protein isolate Chen et al. (2023)
Freeze structuring Pros: Unique fibrous structureCons: High production costs due to high energy consumption(Du et al., 2023) Pea protein, Wheat gluten Structuring the meat analogue by using plant-based derived composites. Journal of food engineering Yuliarti et al. (2021)
Fiber-spinning Pros: Micron-level protein fiber formationCons: High requirements for protein solutions, heavy contamination(Wang et al., 2023) Soy protein Developing soy protein-based analog meat with improved nutritional, physicochemical, and structural properties Joshi et al. (2023)
3D Printing Pros: Control of fiber structure arrangement and distribution of adipose tissueCons: Plant-based meat analog inks are difficult to extrude, making it difficult to mimic the texture of animal meat Pea protein Rheology and extrusion testing to develop printable, print process-optimized formulations Wang et al. (2022)
Mung bean protein, Wheat gluten Improving the functionality of mung bean protein, wheat gluten mixtures, and adding L-cysteine to improve the quality and sensory characteristics of analog meat Chao et al. (2024)Wen et al. (2023)